“During the 1980s over 70% of American adults believed in the existence of abusive Satanic Cults… Another 30% rationalized the lack of evidence due to government cover ups… The following is based on true unexplained events…”
This is the text which opens the 2009 film, The House of the Devil.
What is true:
- The statistics – which don’t actually say that any Satanic ritual abuse (SRA) occurred. The stats are about beliefs. I don’t know which survey was used to cull these particular statistics, but I found this article which mentions a 1990 study that reported “that 90 percent of Utah citizens believed that ritualistic sex abuse was occurring.” So the belief was certainly there.
What is not true:
- Any of the actual events depicted in the film.
The verdict: This film is more an homage to films made in the 1980s. It was recorded on 16mm film to give it an authentic early 80s look, and uses familiar tropes, like the baby-sitter under attack. The use of a “based on a true story” tagline is likely an homage as well, since many films of that era used it. “True unexplained events” could mean anything, really. There were thousands of cases of SRA reported in the 1980s, most of them after a few high-profile cases such as the one described in the book Michelle Remembers, and the McMartin preschool trial. In the end, however, the preschool trial led to charges dropped and dismissed, with no evidence of any actual Satanic abuse, and Michelle Remembers was largely discredited. In many cases of alleged SRA, recovered memories (which are highly questionable and often false memories) played a large role.
One thought on “horror movies “based on a true story”: House of the Devil”
I am a survivor of SRA and let me tell you that the rituals, abuse, deaths and horrors are in fact very real. I have several disorders and physical conditions resulting from all the years I had to endure.